Yesterday early evening CSV Media made the old Crown Court office their new home.
They came up with a fantastic idea of creating a human chain starting from the old offices right up to the new via a human chain and I joined it at the beginning of a 200 strong presence..
Boxes were passed by each human link in the chain against the backdrop of sunshine, drums and laughter. It was a much more enjoyable event than I anticipated and brought together so many different people from a variety of backgrounds and nationality.
Real community action!
Showing posts with label IBC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label IBC. Show all posts
Wednesday, 11 June 2014
Monday, 24 March 2014
Access All Arts returns to Ipswich Town Hall
Access All Arts returns to Ipswich Town Hall on Sunday 6th April, bringing together fun, creativity and free activities under one roof.
Next month’s event will see the return of the ever popular Craft and Vintage Market. This unique handmade and timeless market run by I Make Fun Stuff offers something for everybody with an eclectic mix of homeware, jewellery, artwork and clothes you can’t buy on the high street. More than 40 stalls will be there on the day selling a range of limited vintage and craft items.
Also returning is local children’s music tuition group Muzikidz, which will be running interactive workshops with children five to 15 years, offering them the chance to learn to play a range of instruments and perform in bands. Muzikidz runs weekly sessions both during term time and in the school holidays. This activity is suitable for children of all ages and musical abilities. To sign up or find out more information go to http://www.muzikidz.com/
No booking is required for any of the activities.
Children’s writing workshops will also be running from 10.30am – 12.30pm for children seven and over and as always the Town Hall Tea Room will be open throughout the day serving refreshments.
So, don't forget to get along to the Town Hall on Sunday 6th April from 10am to 4pm to join in. Activity schedules are available fromwww.ipswich.gov.uk/AAA and should you require further information about any of the activities please contact Olivia Grant on 01473 433521.
Friday, 14 March 2014
The Unexpected - Snippets from the Week
First and foremost are the most important and poignant news from the week.
So shocked was I to hear of the sad death of Bob Crow that I was left open mouthed while I was driving. I loathed what he stood for but there was something to admire about this loud, brash, outspoken and passionate man.
I like people who say what they think, mean what they say and refuse to conform to what other people think should be the demeanour of someone in public life. I reckon he was great fun, warm, cuddly and will be sorely missed by many people.
Also sad, but not so shocking, is the passing of the great Tony Benn. Now, he was someone, not in my party, who I had time for. Another outspoken but eloquent man, who managed to sustain an air of graciousness throughout his career. I will leave others to write great tributes for him as i am not knowledgeable enough but my gut instinct was to like and admire him. The boy did good.
Now onto a real tragedy - the missing aeroplane that was travelling to China and appears to have been lost. I am truly surprised that with all our technology, this could still be baffling the experts a week after it took off. I've always had this sense that we could track anybody anywhere if we put enough resource but it appears that there are still improvements to be made. Of course, there is no blame here for the lack of information and by all accounts huge effort is being made to find these poor souls. I'm thinking of their relatives every day and hope they have an answer within the next few hours, not days or weeks. It is pain beyond our comprehension to be left in limbo.
Onto more happy notes, I believe we have 4 medals in the winter Paralympics. What an inspiration these athletes are! I am in awe of their bravery, courage, talent, dedication and physical strength, in the face of adversity. What fantastic human beings - an inspiration to us all. Well done so far, Team GB!
Interesting snippet from LGA and reported in the papers this week
MigrationWatch claims that research by UCL's Centre for Research overstated the likely tax revenues from migrants. It alleges that migrants have instead cost the Exchequer more than £140bn - or £22m a day - from 1995 to 2011. It's UK chief, Sir Andrew Green said: "This finally disposes of the immigration lobby's oft-repeated claims that immigration reduces our tax burden.” Very interesting and in line with my own belief.
At a more local level - I have been spending time on casework that has meant my business has had only 10 hours of my time this week. But the unexpected was that I achieved more in that 10 hours than I would normally do in 20 because I was pushed for time. You know what they say, if you want something done, ask a busy person!
The barmiest compensation claims in recent times
Local authority solicitors are calling on the Government to pay for costly treatment and compensation for a child born with foetal alcohol syndrome after its mother drank excessively while pregnant. ??
Meanwhile a woman who was attacked by a seagull during her lunch break is suing the owner of the building where she worked for £30,000 in damages. Cathie Kelly said she stumbled and injured herself on the steps of the building as she tried to escape the "screaming" bird during her lunch break. ????
Of GREAT Importance:-

I thought Ed was barmy making that announcement - Thanks!
Have a great weekend all and lets see what next week brings.....
So shocked was I to hear of the sad death of Bob Crow that I was left open mouthed while I was driving. I loathed what he stood for but there was something to admire about this loud, brash, outspoken and passionate man.
I like people who say what they think, mean what they say and refuse to conform to what other people think should be the demeanour of someone in public life. I reckon he was great fun, warm, cuddly and will be sorely missed by many people.
Also sad, but not so shocking, is the passing of the great Tony Benn. Now, he was someone, not in my party, who I had time for. Another outspoken but eloquent man, who managed to sustain an air of graciousness throughout his career. I will leave others to write great tributes for him as i am not knowledgeable enough but my gut instinct was to like and admire him. The boy did good.
Now onto a real tragedy - the missing aeroplane that was travelling to China and appears to have been lost. I am truly surprised that with all our technology, this could still be baffling the experts a week after it took off. I've always had this sense that we could track anybody anywhere if we put enough resource but it appears that there are still improvements to be made. Of course, there is no blame here for the lack of information and by all accounts huge effort is being made to find these poor souls. I'm thinking of their relatives every day and hope they have an answer within the next few hours, not days or weeks. It is pain beyond our comprehension to be left in limbo.
Onto more happy notes, I believe we have 4 medals in the winter Paralympics. What an inspiration these athletes are! I am in awe of their bravery, courage, talent, dedication and physical strength, in the face of adversity. What fantastic human beings - an inspiration to us all. Well done so far, Team GB!
Interesting snippet from LGA and reported in the papers this week
MigrationWatch claims that research by UCL's Centre for Research overstated the likely tax revenues from migrants. It alleges that migrants have instead cost the Exchequer more than £140bn - or £22m a day - from 1995 to 2011. It's UK chief, Sir Andrew Green said: "This finally disposes of the immigration lobby's oft-repeated claims that immigration reduces our tax burden.” Very interesting and in line with my own belief.
At a more local level - I have been spending time on casework that has meant my business has had only 10 hours of my time this week. But the unexpected was that I achieved more in that 10 hours than I would normally do in 20 because I was pushed for time. You know what they say, if you want something done, ask a busy person!
The barmiest compensation claims in recent times
Local authority solicitors are calling on the Government to pay for costly treatment and compensation for a child born with foetal alcohol syndrome after its mother drank excessively while pregnant. ??
Meanwhile a woman who was attacked by a seagull during her lunch break is suing the owner of the building where she worked for £30,000 in damages. Cathie Kelly said she stumbled and injured herself on the steps of the building as she tried to escape the "screaming" bird during her lunch break. ????
Of GREAT Importance:-

I thought Ed was barmy making that announcement - Thanks!
Have a great weekend all and lets see what next week brings.....
Saturday, 1 March 2014
While I've been away....
Lots of things have been going on while I've been away.
Being a councillor there is never a good time to take a holiday or work away - Whether it's trying to book outside of full council meetings, area committee meetings or important events, including of course Ipswich town home games (Don't ask a season ticket holder like me to miss any games for any reason whatsoever unless of course it's a matter of life or death!)
However the world survived without me and I have caught up with residents that contacted me, as my very first point of action - and it was lovely to hear them say that they guessed I was away as normally I respond almost immediately.
Going out to deliver my latest leaflet this morning (more on that later) it was lovely to be stopped by residents asking about various issues or just wanting to have a chat about things that are bugging them. The time I spend in the ward is by far more important than any meeting I could go to and it is here in Stoke Park that my true passion lies.
So let's start with a few snippets from neighbourhood watch information newsletters;
Be back soon on some of the bigger news stories that happened while I was away but for now - I have an important date with ITFC and a welcome cheer to make to our Birmingham guests. Fingers crossed...
Being a councillor there is never a good time to take a holiday or work away - Whether it's trying to book outside of full council meetings, area committee meetings or important events, including of course Ipswich town home games (Don't ask a season ticket holder like me to miss any games for any reason whatsoever unless of course it's a matter of life or death!)
However the world survived without me and I have caught up with residents that contacted me, as my very first point of action - and it was lovely to hear them say that they guessed I was away as normally I respond almost immediately.
Going out to deliver my latest leaflet this morning (more on that later) it was lovely to be stopped by residents asking about various issues or just wanting to have a chat about things that are bugging them. The time I spend in the ward is by far more important than any meeting I could go to and it is here in Stoke Park that my true passion lies.
So let's start with a few snippets from neighbourhood watch information newsletters;
Vehicle security from the eyes of an offender
A prolific car crime offender was interviewed recently and the key message was highlighted by him -
Do not to leave anything on view in a vehicle.
He stated that he wouldn’t break in, if he couldn’t see anything.·
Don’t leave sat nat holders, the ring on the windscreen or even the cigarette lighter out of its place as all of these indicated that there was a sat nav in the glove box. ·
He would take anything out of a car – including black bags and sports bags.·
He never carries tools with him for breaking into cars in case he gets stopped en-route by police, he would use something left lying around (a new thought provoking point in the fight against car crime).
Do you have issue with litter/dog fouling etc?
Ipswich Borough Council offer an effective service when areas of litter/dog fouling/graffiti on public areas are of concern to residents.
Anthea PipeCommunity Watch & SNT Liaison Office, Please report anything of this nature on Ipswich 433000.
I have personally used this service on numerous occasions and have found the response to be very fast, usually within the day.
Cannabis Factories
As you may have heard, in the local media, the largest ever cannabis factory in Suffolk was found at a property in Henley Road, Ipswich. Over 1500 cannabis plants were found within 13 rooms at the address, and two males were subsequently charged with the cultivation of cannabis and the abstraction of electricity.
There are some tell-tale signs which may indicate the presence of cannabis cultivation in your area, so please keep an eye (and nose) out:
• Lighting or ventilation equipment, which may be indicated by strong lighting day or night and constant noise from ventilation equipment.
• Covered up or blocked up windows.
• Comings and goings to a property at all times of the day.
• High levels of heat and condensation, which may be indicated by windows constantly misted up.
• Strong sickly smell given off by cannabis plants.
• Lots of power cables, which may be linked to lamp posts.
As you may have heard, in the local media, the largest ever cannabis factory in Suffolk was found at a property in Henley Road, Ipswich. Over 1500 cannabis plants were found within 13 rooms at the address, and two males were subsequently charged with the cultivation of cannabis and the abstraction of electricity.
There are some tell-tale signs which may indicate the presence of cannabis cultivation in your area, so please keep an eye (and nose) out:
• Lighting or ventilation equipment, which may be indicated by strong lighting day or night and constant noise from ventilation equipment.
• Covered up or blocked up windows.
• Comings and goings to a property at all times of the day.
• High levels of heat and condensation, which may be indicated by windows constantly misted up.
• Strong sickly smell given off by cannabis plants.
• Lots of power cables, which may be linked to lamp posts.
Traffic enforcement
Ipswich Central SNT have been doing some good work recently regarding traffic enforcement.
Speed enforcement work has also been taking place recently and this will be continuing with Officers taking the speed gun out and about. Please contact us if you believe that there is a particular speeding location which could do with some attention. I have highlighted Annbrook road and Stoke Park Drive on several occasions.
Thursday, 31 January 2013
Full Council Meeting and Thorington Windfarm
Once again, the administration received questions from the public on why they refuse to nail their colours to the mast and/or do something about the majority concern over the proposed turbines at Thorington, overlooking SW Ipswich.
The leader of the council et al chose to repeat like parrots - 'the contract, which was signed by the previous administration' in other words 'it has nothing to do with us'.
Then up pops Sally Wainman, a real campaigner who challenges any party in administration and has the town in her heart, who wasn't going to let him off so lightly.
She challenged Cllr Ellesmere in a supplementary question, asking him when he was going to stop blaming everyone else and take responsibility for the wishes of the residents in SW Ipswich. Labour are in administration so what was he going to do?
Nothing is the answer.
Nothing of any consequence.
Yes, it wasn't his administration that signed the options contract. Yes, it would be hard for IBC as a council to make a stand against PfR, in fact it would be illegal. However there is nothing legally stopping any of the numerous labour councillors in SW (I am the only Tory) as individuals, in showing they truly represent their people by joining me and SIT in bringing evidence to Babergh that will show lives will be blighted.
I am the only councillor to be doing this. I have learnt much from SIT and Kessingland. This is not what I want for my residents and those in my street because it's not what they want - 92%. So I am choosing to fight hard by collecting evidence along with Ben Gummer, distributing information and attending all relevant meetings.
If other labour councillors did the same, we might get somewhere.
When asked if any labour councillors attended the latest consultation, the leader stated that they all knew the facts by now. Not true. The proposals have been changed and it was useful for me at least to see them, discuss them with PfR and have further conversations with the many residents who attended. Isn't that our job for goodness sake?!
So they do have another get out clause. If Babergh agree at their planning meeting for this to go ahead, we can expect to start hearing them blame Babergh sometime this year. In fact I can already hear it.....
The leader of the council et al chose to repeat like parrots - 'the contract, which was signed by the previous administration' in other words 'it has nothing to do with us'.
Then up pops Sally Wainman, a real campaigner who challenges any party in administration and has the town in her heart, who wasn't going to let him off so lightly.
She challenged Cllr Ellesmere in a supplementary question, asking him when he was going to stop blaming everyone else and take responsibility for the wishes of the residents in SW Ipswich. Labour are in administration so what was he going to do?
Nothing is the answer.
Nothing of any consequence.
Yes, it wasn't his administration that signed the options contract. Yes, it would be hard for IBC as a council to make a stand against PfR, in fact it would be illegal. However there is nothing legally stopping any of the numerous labour councillors in SW (I am the only Tory) as individuals, in showing they truly represent their people by joining me and SIT in bringing evidence to Babergh that will show lives will be blighted.
I am the only councillor to be doing this. I have learnt much from SIT and Kessingland. This is not what I want for my residents and those in my street because it's not what they want - 92%. So I am choosing to fight hard by collecting evidence along with Ben Gummer, distributing information and attending all relevant meetings.
If other labour councillors did the same, we might get somewhere.
When asked if any labour councillors attended the latest consultation, the leader stated that they all knew the facts by now. Not true. The proposals have been changed and it was useful for me at least to see them, discuss them with PfR and have further conversations with the many residents who attended. Isn't that our job for goodness sake?!
So they do have another get out clause. If Babergh agree at their planning meeting for this to go ahead, we can expect to start hearing them blame Babergh sometime this year. In fact I can already hear it.....
Monday, 7 January 2013
Ben Gummer MP - Business in suffolk
Business is a priority for me. for this town. I know only too well how hard the last few years have been running a small business, as I have done exactly that for the last 8 years..
I have said before that until red tape is reduced and things made a bit easier for employers, I will never have any staff but choose to use 3rd party virtual assistants and experts if the need for extra resource arises. This means that others benefit from my business as I do from others. Its important that we remain optimistic for the future, as it's not all bad news for this area.
Ben's latest column shows that he is on the ball on this one and also sees it as a priority. I show it here in full:
phone: 0845 634 9197
email: ben@bengummer.com
I have said before that until red tape is reduced and things made a bit easier for employers, I will never have any staff but choose to use 3rd party virtual assistants and experts if the need for extra resource arises. This means that others benefit from my business as I do from others. Its important that we remain optimistic for the future, as it's not all bad news for this area.
Ben's latest column shows that he is on the ball on this one and also sees it as a priority. I show it here in full:
Business in Suffolk
Back in November I addressed the new Ipswich Chamber of Commerce, which I launched with the Exchequer Secretary David Gauke (a former pupil of Northgate, as it happens) back in 2011. It is clear that while business people are marginally more hopeful than a year or two ago, there is still much trepidation about the future - in UK but especially in Ipswich.
My impression then was that 2012 was a year of treading water for so many businesses, something borne out by a Barclays survey of their small business customers back in the late summer. They found that activity had dropped very slightly, although Suffolk had done less badly than Norfolk and - surprisingly - Cambridgeshire. A great deal of the decline was down to a significant reduction in agricultural revenues, a result of the poor weather and the pressure on food manufacturers at a time when most households are trimming their budgets.
The good news is that new companies in the east of England are achieving the fastest growth of any region other than the south-east, which is only just ahead; both are significantly in excess of the national average. So we are producing good companies that are growing quickly, which is an encouraging sign for the future.
The trick now is to get some of that dynamism into our town, which was the central concern of the business people I spoke to in November. As the Borough Council has identified, we have some of the lowest average weekly wages in the country here in Ipswich, a result not of benefit cuts or anything to do with the government but because we do not have enough better paid, high-skilled jobs in the town. That is something we must all work together to put right. It will take longer than a year but we must re-make a start in these first few days of the 2013.
Contact Information
phone: 0845 634 9197
email: ben@bengummer.com
Tuesday, 13 November 2012
A residents reply to PfR and Thorington Windfarm proposal
Here is an e-mail I received from a resident who will be much affected by the new proposal, with kind permission from them to show it on my blog. I felt it succinctly conveyed the feelings of most of us, from the communications I have been receiving from residents in my ward, Stoke Park.
I have not edited it and have shown the letter in full.
We attended the South West area committee meeting of Ipswich Borough Council (IBC) on 7th November at Suffolk New Academy.
It was at the invitation of a SIT (Stop Ipswich Turbines) Action Group that IBC agreed to invite both SIT and yourselves to speak at this meeting and put both sides of the argument for the erection of 2 wind turbines at Thorington Barn overlooking Belstead Village, Pinewood, Thorington Park and Stoke Park. The land is owned by IBC but any planning application would go to Babergh Disctrict Council (BDC).
SIT made their statement and you (PfR) responded.
With regard to your responses we would comment as follows:-
Noise disturbance to residents
1. Your representative said the area already had a high level of noise both from the A14 and other background noise. This made it sound to us that this justified your company imposing more noise on residents in the area. No mention was made of what “other background noise” you were referring to.
It was pointed out by SIT that the poor road surface on the A14 was a contributory factor to the high level of noise you are recording and that the Highways Authority were hoping to deal with this shortly. Will you be re-assessing the noise levels once this has been done?
Mention was made of the wind turbines being quiet under “normal circumstances”. What do you class as “normal circumstances”?
2. SIT referred to the problems Kessingland were having with noise from the 2 wind turbines erected there. Your response was that the problems with noise they were experiencing were different and that it would not happen at the Thorington Barn site! Surely noise is noise and if you cannot guarantee your turbines will be noise free, we will take it from the residents of Kessingland that we will experience the sort of disturbance to our lives they are experiencing as a direct result of the erection of these turbines.
Flicker
1. Your response to the problem of flicker disturbance to residents was dubious to say the least. It was said it would only affect houses. Unfortunately SIT have evidence that it does in fact also affect ground level, including road surfaces. This could have a devastating effect on traffic along the A14.
2. You were unable to tell us how many people would be affected by possible flicker and mentioned the worst consequences of flicker could be mitigated during the design process. You seem to have missed the point entirely. These residents are not affected by any flicker at the moment and you are proposing to inflict this on them with this proposal. Also, your response did not mention the affect the flicker will have on anyone who has epilepsy. What will the consequences be on their quality of life if they are affected?
Visual effect on the countryside
Your representative did not respond to the visual effect on the countryside raised by SIT.
The area for the proposed wind turbine site is used by many from both Belstead Ipswich and other surrounding areas for walking, bird watching and other recreational activities and the noise/flicker generated by the turbines would destroy this pleasure.
No mention was made of the visual effect of the wind turbines in Belstead village. All residents will see the turbines but most will be within 500 – 800 metres from them. When they walk outside their front doors they will be towering above them.
As mentioned by SIT the law is outdated as to how far away from residential properties the turbines are allowed to be but surely you have a MORAL obligation to people not to put them so close to residential properties. Scotland have an advisory limit of 2km away from residential properties and even this isn’t enough in some cases.
How many people would be affected by the Wind Turbines within 2 km radius?
It appears you had no idea of the people/properties who could be affected by the erection of these wind turbines within a radius of 2 km but you did know on a clear day they could be seen 30 km (18 miles) away! This implies to us that not a lot of consideration is given to residents who may be affected. Certainly you are failing miserably to “consult” with residents in Belstead, Pinewood, Thorington Park and Stoke Park.
Figures quoted for energy production
Your representative quoted the figures these wind turbines would produce when “at full capacity”. As everyone knows, these turbines NEVER run “at full capacity” so the figures are completely irrelevant.
One questioner asked if residents affected by your proposal would get cheaper electricity and again the response “no”.
Applying for and the grant of Planning Consent
The most shocking part of the evening came when your representative explained you would be applying for planning consent from Babergh District Council for the erection of the 2 wind turbines WITHOUT specifying the exact size and type of turbine which would eventually be erected and BDC would grant planning consent on this basis. This cannot be right! If we or any other member of the public applied for planning for an extension on our properties and did not give precise details of the materials to be used etc, there is no way BDC would grant us planning consent.
2 – 3 Wind Turbines at Thorington Barn?
Your representative said you were looking at putting a “maximum” of 2 wind turbines on the site so why are they handing out leaflets clearly showing 3 locations on the map?
Distance from residential properties
Your representative did not mention that the proposed wind turbines would be only 500 metres away from residential properties. When I asked another of your representatives how she would feel if she lived so close to them she replied that she lived near a power station, as if that was a good enough reason for the turbines to be inflicted on us! Perhaps she had the choice BEFORE she moved to her present property and was able to make an informed decision, unlike us!
Consultation
You mentioned on several occasions the question of “consultation” with those affected. Well, as mentioned above you are falling well short of your obligations to residents who will
be affected if this proposal goes ahead. It appears to us that your first obligations are to your shareholders and not to those whose lives will be ruined by this proposal.
Had it not been for the formation of the SIT Action Group most of us would not have realised the significance of your proposal and we suspect had it not been for the formation of this group we would not have heard from you until it was too late.
Lease Agreement
Well, here again there appears to be some problem with IBC or yourselves letting anyone have a copy of this illusive agreement so residents of Ipswich can consider its implications. Unfortunately IBC decided to play the “political card” and opt out of responsibility for the grant of the lease as if there was nothing they could do to stop any application if their residents asked them to.
It was clear to us that IBC had let down their residents in the first place by agreeing to grant the lease to PfR without proper consultation with those residents would be affected by such a monumental proposal. Once in place, the residents will have to put up with them for 25 YEARS - this will be for the rest of our lives)! Surely this was enough to make the Council think twice and write personally to everyone concerned.
General
In general, we felt that we did not gain much from your representatives being at the meeting because most of the responses given were “they could not give a definite response yet”! Well, when will you give us definite responses to ALL our concerns?
We, along with many other people we have spoken to, did not have any objection to the erection of wind turbines until this proposal came along in the naive, mistaken belief that your company and others like you would not consider erecting massive wind turbines so close to residential properties. These kind of proposals will prove your undoing when more and more people realise the devastating effects they will have on their everyday lives.
Make no mistake about it, we in Belstead Village and other members of the action group SIT are determined to fight to stop BDC granting planning consent for your proposal. If you are in any doubt about the strength of feeling against your proposal then drive through the village and come and speak to us individually.
Mr and Mrs Daynes - Belstead village
I have not edited it and have shown the letter in full.
We attended the South West area committee meeting of Ipswich Borough Council (IBC) on 7th November at Suffolk New Academy.
It was at the invitation of a SIT (Stop Ipswich Turbines) Action Group that IBC agreed to invite both SIT and yourselves to speak at this meeting and put both sides of the argument for the erection of 2 wind turbines at Thorington Barn overlooking Belstead Village, Pinewood, Thorington Park and Stoke Park. The land is owned by IBC but any planning application would go to Babergh Disctrict Council (BDC).
SIT made their statement and you (PfR) responded.
With regard to your responses we would comment as follows:-
Noise disturbance to residents
1. Your representative said the area already had a high level of noise both from the A14 and other background noise. This made it sound to us that this justified your company imposing more noise on residents in the area. No mention was made of what “other background noise” you were referring to.
It was pointed out by SIT that the poor road surface on the A14 was a contributory factor to the high level of noise you are recording and that the Highways Authority were hoping to deal with this shortly. Will you be re-assessing the noise levels once this has been done?
Mention was made of the wind turbines being quiet under “normal circumstances”. What do you class as “normal circumstances”?
2. SIT referred to the problems Kessingland were having with noise from the 2 wind turbines erected there. Your response was that the problems with noise they were experiencing were different and that it would not happen at the Thorington Barn site! Surely noise is noise and if you cannot guarantee your turbines will be noise free, we will take it from the residents of Kessingland that we will experience the sort of disturbance to our lives they are experiencing as a direct result of the erection of these turbines.
Flicker
1. Your response to the problem of flicker disturbance to residents was dubious to say the least. It was said it would only affect houses. Unfortunately SIT have evidence that it does in fact also affect ground level, including road surfaces. This could have a devastating effect on traffic along the A14.
2. You were unable to tell us how many people would be affected by possible flicker and mentioned the worst consequences of flicker could be mitigated during the design process. You seem to have missed the point entirely. These residents are not affected by any flicker at the moment and you are proposing to inflict this on them with this proposal. Also, your response did not mention the affect the flicker will have on anyone who has epilepsy. What will the consequences be on their quality of life if they are affected?
Visual effect on the countryside
Your representative did not respond to the visual effect on the countryside raised by SIT.
The area for the proposed wind turbine site is used by many from both Belstead Ipswich and other surrounding areas for walking, bird watching and other recreational activities and the noise/flicker generated by the turbines would destroy this pleasure.
No mention was made of the visual effect of the wind turbines in Belstead village. All residents will see the turbines but most will be within 500 – 800 metres from them. When they walk outside their front doors they will be towering above them.
As mentioned by SIT the law is outdated as to how far away from residential properties the turbines are allowed to be but surely you have a MORAL obligation to people not to put them so close to residential properties. Scotland have an advisory limit of 2km away from residential properties and even this isn’t enough in some cases.
How many people would be affected by the Wind Turbines within 2 km radius?
It appears you had no idea of the people/properties who could be affected by the erection of these wind turbines within a radius of 2 km but you did know on a clear day they could be seen 30 km (18 miles) away! This implies to us that not a lot of consideration is given to residents who may be affected. Certainly you are failing miserably to “consult” with residents in Belstead, Pinewood, Thorington Park and Stoke Park.
Figures quoted for energy production
Your representative quoted the figures these wind turbines would produce when “at full capacity”. As everyone knows, these turbines NEVER run “at full capacity” so the figures are completely irrelevant.
One questioner asked if residents affected by your proposal would get cheaper electricity and again the response “no”.
Applying for and the grant of Planning Consent
The most shocking part of the evening came when your representative explained you would be applying for planning consent from Babergh District Council for the erection of the 2 wind turbines WITHOUT specifying the exact size and type of turbine which would eventually be erected and BDC would grant planning consent on this basis. This cannot be right! If we or any other member of the public applied for planning for an extension on our properties and did not give precise details of the materials to be used etc, there is no way BDC would grant us planning consent.
2 – 3 Wind Turbines at Thorington Barn?
Your representative said you were looking at putting a “maximum” of 2 wind turbines on the site so why are they handing out leaflets clearly showing 3 locations on the map?
Distance from residential properties
Your representative did not mention that the proposed wind turbines would be only 500 metres away from residential properties. When I asked another of your representatives how she would feel if she lived so close to them she replied that she lived near a power station, as if that was a good enough reason for the turbines to be inflicted on us! Perhaps she had the choice BEFORE she moved to her present property and was able to make an informed decision, unlike us!
Consultation
You mentioned on several occasions the question of “consultation” with those affected. Well, as mentioned above you are falling well short of your obligations to residents who will
be affected if this proposal goes ahead. It appears to us that your first obligations are to your shareholders and not to those whose lives will be ruined by this proposal.
Had it not been for the formation of the SIT Action Group most of us would not have realised the significance of your proposal and we suspect had it not been for the formation of this group we would not have heard from you until it was too late.
Lease Agreement
Well, here again there appears to be some problem with IBC or yourselves letting anyone have a copy of this illusive agreement so residents of Ipswich can consider its implications. Unfortunately IBC decided to play the “political card” and opt out of responsibility for the grant of the lease as if there was nothing they could do to stop any application if their residents asked them to.
It was clear to us that IBC had let down their residents in the first place by agreeing to grant the lease to PfR without proper consultation with those residents would be affected by such a monumental proposal. Once in place, the residents will have to put up with them for 25 YEARS - this will be for the rest of our lives)! Surely this was enough to make the Council think twice and write personally to everyone concerned.
General
In general, we felt that we did not gain much from your representatives being at the meeting because most of the responses given were “they could not give a definite response yet”! Well, when will you give us definite responses to ALL our concerns?
We, along with many other people we have spoken to, did not have any objection to the erection of wind turbines until this proposal came along in the naive, mistaken belief that your company and others like you would not consider erecting massive wind turbines so close to residential properties. These kind of proposals will prove your undoing when more and more people realise the devastating effects they will have on their everyday lives.
Make no mistake about it, we in Belstead Village and other members of the action group SIT are determined to fight to stop BDC granting planning consent for your proposal. If you are in any doubt about the strength of feeling against your proposal then drive through the village and come and speak to us individually.
Mr and Mrs Daynes - Belstead village
Wednesday, 14 March 2012
War On Drugs - part 4
Another email that I received and from Ben, who gave me permission to print in full.
At last someone who shares my concerns about legalising. And I have to agree totally with the last 2 paragraphs. My sentiments exactly.
Nadia, just a thought based on the last paragraph of Ali's contribution, and some statistics I vaguely remember Oliver Letwin spouting in Bournemouth when he was Shadow Home Sec.
90% or so of acquisitive crime is drug related.
In the UK, at the retail end of the drug supply, we have a nightmarishly bad system. People are locked up, given little help if any, then pushed straight back out onto the same streets.
Talking to those agencies like Focus 12, where Chip Somers will tell you that the key to staying straight is learning how to break that cycle, you can certainly see the argument for legalisation (an argument he was absolutely against when last we spoke).
The argument for legalisation is a sensible one, based on cost/benefit analysis. If you legalise and regulate the use of many of the illegal drugs on the market today, you would be able to raise revenue through duty, and remove a huge amount of the work the police would have to provide, reducing their workload and saving a couple of billion pounds from the Home Office budget. However. All that saving would go straight onto the NHS budget. Treatment is hard. There is nowhere near enough treatment available. Illegal drugs are illegal based on scientific evidence criteria.
Drugs like Heroin and Crack Cocaine, or Crystal Methamphetamine, are harmful to use. They are highly addictive, and are designed to become more addictive. There are chemists out there working for organised crime who are designing synthetic forms of these drugs to boost the addictive qualities (just like tobacco manufacturers used to do) and the problem is that the need to feed the habit will eventually become all consuming to the user.
I have used recreational drugs in the past. Alcohol and tobacco mainly. I also tried cannabis but it did nothing for me so I didn't bother.
I know others who regularly used recreational drugs and I have seen them destroy their lives. A maths teacher who smoked cannabis on a regular basis and ended up sounding like Ozzy Osbourne and unable to work a till in a pub because he couldn't add up. A school friend who smoked just one spliff of cannabis with a high THC content and went on to suffer from panic attacks for the next 10 years. Another school friend who was so disturbed by his use of cannabis that he hung himself in his bedroom. An acquaintance from my younger days who tried every drug under the sun and dropped dead at 29 from heart failure. Another friend whose fiancee dropped dead at 26 whilst asleep, following years of drug abuse.
These drugs kill. Using them will kill you eventually. Or it might not. You might be lucky.
But it really is Russian roulette. The country needs to spend far more budget on dealing with the organised crime (narco-terrorists) who bring the stuff in, or increasingly produce it here. The cannabis growing trade in Ipswich is controlled by the Vietnamese for instance. Crack and heroin comes up from London as well as across from Liverpool. Ectasy comes from Holland via Harwich and Felixstowe. Cocaine mostly comes up from London or down from Glasgow and Manchester. All of it is easily available. Far too easily available.
Drug pushers are bad people when they are selling drugs to addicts. Whether that be the landlord of the pub serving a known alcoholic, or the doctor who continues to prescribe Vicodin to a patient who is addicted, or the street level dealer pushing to kids on bikes.
We need to have a serious think about how we are going to approach drugs policy in the UK. I can understand the legalisation approach but to me that is abrogating responsibility. We cannot just give up because it is hard. We have to redouble our efforts to tackle supply, whilst simultaneously providing help and support to victims so as to reduce demand.
The same arguments were made five years ago about street prostitution. I remember quite senior people telling me that the strategy wouldn't work, that it would push prostitutes to different areas of town but they'd come back, that it would push it to other towns, etc. To some minor extent there has been some of that, but you won the battle against street prostitution. Why not win the one against drugs as well?
Ben
At last someone who shares my concerns about legalising. And I have to agree totally with the last 2 paragraphs. My sentiments exactly.
Nadia, just a thought based on the last paragraph of Ali's contribution, and some statistics I vaguely remember Oliver Letwin spouting in Bournemouth when he was Shadow Home Sec.
90% or so of acquisitive crime is drug related.
In the UK, at the retail end of the drug supply, we have a nightmarishly bad system. People are locked up, given little help if any, then pushed straight back out onto the same streets.
Talking to those agencies like Focus 12, where Chip Somers will tell you that the key to staying straight is learning how to break that cycle, you can certainly see the argument for legalisation (an argument he was absolutely against when last we spoke).
The argument for legalisation is a sensible one, based on cost/benefit analysis. If you legalise and regulate the use of many of the illegal drugs on the market today, you would be able to raise revenue through duty, and remove a huge amount of the work the police would have to provide, reducing their workload and saving a couple of billion pounds from the Home Office budget. However. All that saving would go straight onto the NHS budget. Treatment is hard. There is nowhere near enough treatment available. Illegal drugs are illegal based on scientific evidence criteria.
Drugs like Heroin and Crack Cocaine, or Crystal Methamphetamine, are harmful to use. They are highly addictive, and are designed to become more addictive. There are chemists out there working for organised crime who are designing synthetic forms of these drugs to boost the addictive qualities (just like tobacco manufacturers used to do) and the problem is that the need to feed the habit will eventually become all consuming to the user.
I have used recreational drugs in the past. Alcohol and tobacco mainly. I also tried cannabis but it did nothing for me so I didn't bother.
I know others who regularly used recreational drugs and I have seen them destroy their lives. A maths teacher who smoked cannabis on a regular basis and ended up sounding like Ozzy Osbourne and unable to work a till in a pub because he couldn't add up. A school friend who smoked just one spliff of cannabis with a high THC content and went on to suffer from panic attacks for the next 10 years. Another school friend who was so disturbed by his use of cannabis that he hung himself in his bedroom. An acquaintance from my younger days who tried every drug under the sun and dropped dead at 29 from heart failure. Another friend whose fiancee dropped dead at 26 whilst asleep, following years of drug abuse.
These drugs kill. Using them will kill you eventually. Or it might not. You might be lucky.
But it really is Russian roulette. The country needs to spend far more budget on dealing with the organised crime (narco-terrorists) who bring the stuff in, or increasingly produce it here. The cannabis growing trade in Ipswich is controlled by the Vietnamese for instance. Crack and heroin comes up from London as well as across from Liverpool. Ectasy comes from Holland via Harwich and Felixstowe. Cocaine mostly comes up from London or down from Glasgow and Manchester. All of it is easily available. Far too easily available.
Drug pushers are bad people when they are selling drugs to addicts. Whether that be the landlord of the pub serving a known alcoholic, or the doctor who continues to prescribe Vicodin to a patient who is addicted, or the street level dealer pushing to kids on bikes.
We need to have a serious think about how we are going to approach drugs policy in the UK. I can understand the legalisation approach but to me that is abrogating responsibility. We cannot just give up because it is hard. We have to redouble our efforts to tackle supply, whilst simultaneously providing help and support to victims so as to reduce demand.
The same arguments were made five years ago about street prostitution. I remember quite senior people telling me that the strategy wouldn't work, that it would push prostitutes to different areas of town but they'd come back, that it would push it to other towns, etc. To some minor extent there has been some of that, but you won the battle against street prostitution. Why not win the one against drugs as well?
Ben
Friday, 23 December 2011
Parents Network programmes-Choices- for Ipswich and Suffolk
December 2102
If you have a parenting programme or regular parenting support group to add to this leaflet or you wish to receive a copy each month to share with parents and colleagues email: Carole.Williams@ipswich.gov.uk
|
Strengthening Families Programme 7
week programme
|
|||||
|
Venue
|
Start Date
|
Times
|
To book a place/more information
|
Additional details
|
|
|
Woodbridge
Youth Centre, The Avenue, IP12 4PA
|
Thursday 24th
Jan
|
4pm –
6.30pm
|
Gill
Francis (07718 100893 / 01473 263322)
|
|
|
|
Ipswich
Academy, Lindbergh Rd, IP3 9PZ
|
Tuesday 5th
Feb
|
10am –
12.30pm
|
Gill
Francis (07718 100893 / 01473 263322)
|
|
|
|
Suffolk
New Academy
Mallard
Way
|
Wednesday
15th May
|
4.00 – 6.30
p.m
|
Carole Williams - Senior Parenting
Practitioner, Ipswich Borough Council 01473 433438 or 07921941620
|
Refreshments
provided Parents of young people aged 10-14
|
|
|
Triple P
Seminars for parents with children
aged 0 -12
Universal, no booking required |
|||||
|
Venue
|
Start Date
|
Times
|
To book a place/more information
|
Additional details
|
|
|
Pipers
Vale Primary School, Raeburn Road, Ipswich, IP3 0EW
|
3
sessions: Wednesday 28th November, Wednesday 5th
December, Wednesday 12th December
|
8.45am –
10.15am
|
Melanie Hamilton or the school reception on
01473 320413
Carole Williams - Senior Parenting
Practitioner, Ipswich Borough Council 01473 433438 or 07921941620
|
This series of three evidence-based seminars are for all interested
parents, grandparents and carers from Pipers
Vale Primary School and the surrounding area.
|
|
|
Triple P
Teen Seminars for parents with children aged 11-16
Universal,
no booking required
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Triple P
Group (Age 4-11) Eight week programme
– Booking required
|
||||||||
|
Venue
|
Start Date
|
Times
|
To book a place/more information
|
Additional details
|
||||
|
Pipers
Vale Primary School, Raeburn Rd, IP3 0EW
|
21st
Jan, 28th Jan,
4th
Feb, 11th Feb
18th
No group,
25th
Feb 4th Mar,
11th
Mar, 18th Mar
|
Monday
1.00
– 3.00 p.m
|
07921 941
620
Melanie Hamilton or the school reception on
01473 320413
|
`
|
||||
|
Whitton Primary School, Shakespeare Rd, IP1 6ET
|
24th
Jan, 31st Jan, 7th Feb, 14th Feb, 21st
No group, 28th Feb, 7th Mar, 14th Mar, 21st
Mar
|
Thursdays
12.45pm
– 2.45pm
|
07921 941
620
|
|
||||
|
Britannia Primary School
|
TBC
|
|
07921 941
620
|
|
||||
|
River of Life Church
2, Carr Road
Felixstowe
|
13th
May, 20th May, 27th May half term (no group)3rd
Jun, 10th Jun, 17th Jun, 24th Jun, 1st
Jul, 8th Jul
|
Monday
7.00
– 9.00 pm
|
07921 941
620
|
Evening
Group
|
||||
|
Triple P
Group Teen (Age 11-16)
|
||||||||
|
Venue
|
Start Date
|
Times
|
To book a place/more information
|
Additional details
|
||||
|
Suffolk
New Academy
Mallard
Way
|
Tuesday 23rd
Apr, 30th Apr, 7th May, 21st May, 28th
May half term, 4th Jun, 11th Jun 18th, 25th
|
Tuesday
9.00 0
11.00 a.m
|
Carole Williams - Senior Parenting
Practitioner, Ipswich Borough Council 01473 433438 or 07921941620
|
|
||||
|
Raising Responsible
Teenagers seminar followed by Teen Triple P Group
St Albans High School, Digby Rd, IP4 3NJ
|
Seminar: 14th
Jan, 9.30am – 11am
Group: 28th Jan, 9.30am – 11.30am |
|
To be
confirmed
|
|||||
|
Triple P
talks for staff (0 – 11)
|
||||||||
|
Venue
|
Start Date
|
Times
|
To book a place/more information
|
Additional Details
|
||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Triple P
Teen talks for staff (12 – 16)
|
||||||||
|
Webster
Stratton (BABY & TODDLER) (The
Incredible Years)
|
||||
|
Venue
|
Start Date
|
Times
|
To book a place/more information
|
Additional details
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Webster
Stratton (Age 2-6) (The Incredible Years)
|
|||||||
|
Venue
|
Start Date
|
Times
|
To book a place/more information
|
Additional details
|
|||
|
Highfield
Children’s Centre, Chesterfield Drive, IP1 6DW
|
|
TBC
|
Jannice.Simpson@suffolk.gov.uk
|
Crèche
provided
|
|||
|
Wellington CC, Chevallier St, IP1 2PB
|
Rolling
Programme
|
|
|
|
|||
|
The Oaks CC, Grange Rd, Felixstowe, IP11 2LA
|
Tuesday 15th
January
|
1pm- 3pm
|
|
|
|||
|
Sutton Heath, IP12 3TD
|
January
2013 TBC
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Caring
Dads
|
|||||||
|
|
TBC. 19
week programme.
|
TBC
|
For more
information contact the Children’s centre
01473
283788
|
Referrals
only.
Tel: 01473
283788.
|
|||
|
Brett River CC, Old Corn Exchange,
Hadleigh, IP7 5DN
|
Thursdays
TBC
|
7pm – 9pm
|
|
Referrals
only.
|
|||
|
Parents
Are People (8 week programme)
Confidence Course for Parents
|
|||||||
|
Suffolk New Academy
Mallard
Way, IP2 9LR
|
14th
January
|
Monday
9.15am – 11.30am
|
Marie
Weatherall – Suffolk Coaching Hub
marie@suffolkcoachinghub.org.uk
Mobile - 0750 4119665
07921 941
620
|
Excluding
half term
A programme
of workshops for mothers who may be feeling a low in confidence. Uses
coaching and solution focused techniques to help them boost their self-esteem
to be more effective in their parenting role and in life.
|
|||
|
Lighthouse Women’s Centre
37 Berners
St, IP1 3LN
|
15th
January
|
Tuesday
9.15am – 11.30am
|
Marie
Weatherall – Suffolk Coaching Hub
marie@suffolkcoachinghub.org.uk
Mobile - 0750 4119665
07921 941
620
|
|
|||
|
Who’s In Charge (Eight week programme with a two
month follow up)
|
|||||||
Grafton House
Russell
Road IP1 2DE
|
9th
January – 6th March
(with two month
follow up)
|
Wednesdays
10-12.30 p.m
|
Referrals
to
01473
433438
07921 941
620
|
Free
bus runs from town centre to the Grafton House every 20 minutes
For
parents (of children aged 10-18) who are experiencing abuse by their children.
See
below for more information.
|
|||
|
Freedom Programme
|
|||||||
Lighthouse Women’s Aid |
Various Venues and
dates
Continuous Rolling
Programme
|
Mornings
Afternoons
Evenings
|
Katy/Michelle
01473 220776/9
|
|
|||
Cherry Blossom Children’s Centre |
Wednesdays TBC
|
1pm – 2.30pm
|
|
|
|||
|
Tree House Children’s Centre
|
|
|
Paula
Rogers Ormiston Children's Centre 01473 724549
|
Rolling
programme in term time.
|
|||
|
The Willows CC,
Magdalene
Close, IP2 9UX
|
Rolling programme
|
Contact for dates and times
|
Michelle
Pearce & Tracey Stribling
01473
260882
|
|
|||
Quayside CC, UCS, IP4 1QJ |
Rolling Programme
|
Contact
for dates and times
|
Julie Robinson & Lisa Church
07595
087782
078872
420537
|
|
|||
Lighthouse Women’s Aid |
STOP
PRESS
|
|
New Women’s Centre open now, 37 Berners St, IP1 3LN
|
Offering
a range of new and exciting programmes for women including Tai Chi/DIY/self
esteem
|
|||
|
Stronger
Families Programme
|
|||||||
Lighthouse
Women’s Aid
|
Rolling Programme
|
4-6pm for 12 weeks
|
Group programme for mothers and children 4 – 16
who have experienced domestic abuse.
Sessions on responsibility, positive
problem solving, conflict resolution, feelings awareness and safety planning.
Stronger Families is for families in which the perpetrator has already left
the home, or in which the mother is no longer in a relationship with the
perpetrator.
|
||||
|
The Solihull Approach
|
|||||||
Meredith
Children’s Centre
|
January TBC
|
For 10 weeks
|
For
more information or to make a referral call Natasha or Emily: 01473 242181
The
course is aimed at parents with children under 3 years old, will also take
referrals for pregnant mothers.
|
The
course is about tuning into
children and exploring feelings, parenting styles and communication, self
regulation and anger management, increasing
confidence in parents and children, giving parents strategies for repair when
things go wrong and promoting reflective, sensitive and effective parenting.
|
|||
TBC
|
January 2013 TBC
|
|
0845
603 7197
|
|
|||
SCC
Community Learning and Skills Development –
Courses
for Parents 2013
For Community Learning Courses
contact:
Murrayside reception
01473 712645 Alternative
Contact: Lyndsey Hessey, 01473 325284
|
Venue
|
Course
Title
|
Day
and Times
|
Starting
|
To
book a place contact:
|
|
Pemberton
House, Curriers Lane
|
Living
with Children
|
Tuesdays 6.15pm
– 8.15pm
|
15th
January
|
0845 603 7197
|
|
Murrayside
Leap Centre IP3 9JL
|
Living
with Teenagers
|
Wednesdays
1pm – 3pm
|
16th
January
|
0845 603 7197
|
|
Ipswich
Murrayside Leap Centre
|
Developing
Personal Confidence & Self Awareness for Parents/Carers
|
Wednesdays
10am – 12pm
|
16th
January
|
0845 603 7197
|
|
Felixstowe
Community Hub, Maidstone Rd, IP11 9EF
|
Living
with Children
|
Tuesdays
10am – 12pm
|
15th
January
|
0845 603 7197
|
For programmes in your area contact:
Ipswich Senior Parenting Practitioner
- Ipswich Borough Council 07921 941 620
Suffolk County Parenting Co-ordinater
- Suffolk County Council 07515 188522
Vacant
Ipswich & Coastal Area Parenting Co-ordinater - Suffolk County Council 07540 671191
South & West Suffolk Area Parenting Co-ordinater - Suffolk County
Council 07540 671192
North, Waveney and Central
Suffolk County Parenting Co-ordinater -
Suffolk County Council 07515 188522
See below for programme descriptions:
Strengthening Families Programme
An evidence based programme for
parents and young people aged
between 10 and 14 years. This is a DVD
and activity based programme, which supports families to have a positive
outlook as young people approach their teenage years.
Parents aim to improve their nurturing
and support skills while considering effective discipline and guidance
strategies. Young people build skills
for resisting peer pressure and dealing with stress. During the sessions the families work
together to reflect on the strengths of their family.
This programme has been proved to be
effective in preventing alcohol and substance misuse amongst young people.
|
Triple
P (Positive Parenting Programme)
This set of
interventions was developed at the
·
Group
Triple P runs for 8 weeks (including 3 weeks where 1:1 phone support is
substituted for group meetings).
·
Group
Triple P Teen runs for 8 weeks (including 3 weeks where 1:1 phone support is
substituted for group meetings).
·
Primary
Care Triple P is a 1:1 intervention tailored to the particular issues the
parent wants to work on, and supported by professionally designed tip sheets
for parents to keep. Sessions can be phone-based as well as face-to-face.
·
Seminar
Triple P is a series of 3 presentations on raising confident, resilient
children, which covers issues of interest to a universal audience. These can be delivered to a large group
(up to 50), for example in school or the workplace.
·
Seminar
Triple P Teen is a series of 3 presentations on raising connected, competent
and resilient teenagers, which covers issues of interest to a universal
audience. These can be delivered to a
large group (up to 50), for example in school or the workplace.
|
The Incredible Years/Webster
Stratton
Created by Caroline Webster Stratton, an American
clinical psychologist used and researched for 20 years, this is an early
intervention programme for parents of children under 10. The programme encourages parents to build
strong relationships with their children through play and rewarding positive
behaviour. It strengthens communication and enables parents/carers to
understand the developmental stages of the child.
After completing the course parents will have a range of
tools from which to choose including; effective limit setting, time-out,
handling consequences and problem–solving.
This programme is appropriate for all families including
those with young people with a diagnosis of ADHD or ODD.
Living with Children/Living with Teenagers
The courses are offered as part of the Suffolk Community
Learning Adult Education Programme and are accredited with the Open College
Network. The course is open to any
parent or guardian of a child or teenager who would like to develop their
skills and knowledge. Parents can enrol
themselves or agencies can make referrals on their behalf. The course offers parents a chance to develop
their skills and learn some new ideas. The course covers understanding
children’s needs and parent’s needs, recognising different styles of parenting,
developing skills in a positive communication style, listening skills and ways
to support children’s self esteem, positive strategies for managing behaviour
and setting limits. Participants will
also be able to receive information about other learning opportunities they may
wish to go on to.
For further details contact Gill Johnson@suffolk.gov.uk
|
Caring Dads
Developed
in Canada, is an intervention programme for fathers
(including biological, step, common-law) who have physically abused,
emotionally abused or neglected their children, or exposed their children to
domestic violence or who are deemed to be at high-risk for these behaviours.
It consists of a 17-week, empirically-based, manualised group parenting
intervention for fathers, systematic outreach to mothers to ensure safety and
freedom from coercion, and ongoing, collaborative case management of fathers
with referrers and with other professionals involved with men’s families. The
group component of Caring Dads combines elements of parenting, fathering,
battering and child protection practice to enhance the safety and well-being
of children. Programme principles emphasize the need to enhance men’s
motivation, promote child-centred fathering, address men’s ability to engage
in respectful, non-abusive co-parenting with children’s mothers, recognize
that children’s experience of trauma will impact the rate of possible change,
and work collaboratively with other service providers to ensure that children
benefit (and are not unintentionally harmed) as a result of father’s
participation in intervention. Run by team of male and female facilitators.
See www.caringdads.org
|
Who’s In Charge
Does your child threaten, hurt or
intimidate you? Do you feel you are losing control? Want to better handle
conflict?
The Who’s in Charge? Group is an 8
week programme for parents or carers of young people (8-18) who are beyond
control or defiant. The group aims to:
Provide a supportive environment to
share experiences and ideas
Reduce the guilt and shame most
parents feel
Offer ideas to help to develop
individual strategies for managing your child’s behaviour
Explore ways of increasing safety and
well being
Help parents feel more in control and
less stressed.
Suffolk Family Learning is part of Community
Learning and Skills Development and offers a comprehensive range of programmes
for parents, carers and families. We work across the county in partnership with
schools, nurseries and other voluntary and statutory organisations.
Being a parent/carer and supporting children's
development and learning is one of the most enjoyable and challenging jobs
there is. All these programmes give the opportunity to share ideas and
experiences with other parents and carers in a friendly atmosphere.
The aims of Family
Learning are to:
enhance the skills of
the children involved in intensive programmes
enhance the home
school partnership
encourage home
activities
increase the
understanding of the children's curriculum
increase the
literacy, language and numeracy skills of the adults
Contact: 01379 672711
Living with
Babies Course
Part of Community
Learning and Skills Development Family Learning Courses
Parents attend with
their babies
Courses are 5
sessions of 2 hours and give parents a chance to share activities with their
baby, have a go at making games and activities to do at home. The course includes an introduction to how
babies develop and learn.
|
AUTISM
Autism
Please contact Autism Suffolk for
details of times and dates 01473 632700.
Karen Smith
Family Support Worker
Autism
Tel 01473 632700
|
Parents Under
Pressure™
is a new 20-week
programme for parents who have a child under two and are on an opioid treatment
programme or an alcohol abstinence/relapse prevention programme. Parents
Under Pressure™ aims to
help families with the difficult job of parenting, providing them with the safe
and caring support they need. Throughout the programme, NSPCC workers will
visit parents in their own home to provide support and guidance on parenting
and on maintaining their own emotional wellbeing. For further information,
please contact Ipswich Service Centre, NSPCC, Hyde Park House, 1 Crown Street,
Ipswich, IP1 3LG. Tel: 01473 234850. Email: IpswichAdminInbox@NSPCC.org.uk
Local Children’s Centres
The Hawthorn Children's Centre (IP2
0QY)
Highfield Children's Centre (IP1 6DW)
Hillside Children's Centre (IP2 8NY)
Meredith Children's Centre (IP1 6ED)
Chatterbox Children's Centre (IP4 5HB)
Ormiston Children's Centre (IP3 9BU)
Quayside Children's Centre (IP4 1QJ)
Ravenswood Community Children's Centre (IP3 9QJ)
The Tree House Children's Centre (IP3 0RH)
Wellington Children's Centre (IP1 2PB)
The Willows Children's Centre (IP2 9UX)
The Wooden House Children's Centre (IP4 3EJ)
Highfield Children's Centre (IP1 6DW)
Hillside Children's Centre (IP2 8NY)
Meredith Children's Centre (IP1 6ED)
Chatterbox Children's Centre (IP4 5HB)
Ormiston Children's Centre (IP3 9BU)
Quayside Children's Centre (IP4 1QJ)
Ravenswood Community Children's Centre (IP3 9QJ)
The Tree House Children's Centre (IP3 0RH)
Wellington Children's Centre (IP1 2PB)
The Willows Children's Centre (IP2 9UX)
The Wooden House Children's Centre (IP4 3EJ)
For programmes in your area contact:
Ipswich Senior Parenting Practitioner
- Ipswich Borough Council 07921 941 620
Suffolk County Parenting Co-ordinater
- Suffolk County Council 07515 188522
Ipswich & Coastal Area Parenting Co-ordinater - Suffolk County Council 07540 671191
South & West Suffolk Area Parenting Co-ordinater - Suffolk County
Council 07540 671192
North, Waveney and Central
Suffolk County Parenting Co-ordinater -
Suffolk County Council 07515 188522
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

